<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Thang Blog &#187; heterosexism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fridaythang.com/blog/tag/heterosexism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fridaythang.com/blog</link>
	<description>One 20-something trans woman&#039;s free associations on gender, politics, geekery, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dances with Avatars</title>
		<link>http://fridaythang.com/blog/2009/12/28/dances-with-avatars/</link>
		<comments>http://fridaythang.com/blog/2009/12/28/dances-with-avatars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterosexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fridaythang.com/blog/?p=1384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a 3D showing of Avatar last night, and really enjoyed it. I thought it was beautiful and relatively engaging. I&#8217;m not positive if needed to be almost 3 hours long, but it did allow for a lot of room to establish the world and the characters. That said, it was a really racist, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a 3D showing of <em>Avatar </em>last night, and really enjoyed it. I thought it was beautiful and relatively engaging. I&#8217;m not positive if needed to be almost 3 hours long, but it did allow for a lot of room to establish the world and the characters. That said, it was a really racist, colonialist movie that also fit comfortably within the sexist paradigm of Western culture and storytelling.</p>
<p><span id="more-1384"></span></p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m not the first or only one to comment on <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=avatar+racist&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">Avatar&#8217;s racial dynamic.</a> Sci-fi site io9 <a href="http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar">says it best</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Movies like <em>Avatar </em>and <em>District 9</em>] are movies about white guilt. Our main white characters realize that they are complicit in a system which is destroying aliens, AKA people of color &#8211; their cultures, their habitats, and their populations. The whites realize this when they begin to assimilate into the &#8220;alien&#8221; cultures and see things from a new perspective. To purge their overwhelming sense of guilt, they switch sides, become &#8220;race traitors,&#8221; and fight against their old comrades. But then they go beyond assimilation and become leaders of the people they once oppressed. This is the essence of the white guilt fantasy, laid bare. It&#8217;s not just a wish to be absolved of the crimes whites have committed against people of color; it&#8217;s not just a wish to join the side of moral justice in battle. It&#8217;s a wish to lead people of color from the inside rather than from the (oppressive, white) outside.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, <em>Avatar </em>is yet another story of a male knight in shining armor running to the rescue of oppressed &#8220;savages.&#8221; Sure, they do much of the work themselves, and there are strong female supporting characters, but the movie is very clear that without Jack, the Na&#8217;vi would have been screwed. Likewise, <a href="http://globalshift.org/2009/12/dances-with-discrimination-on-avatar-racism-misogyny-and-disabled-prejudice/">from GlobalShift</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>As preferred as the Na’vi culture obviously is, <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/12/guest-op-ed-i-hated-avatar-with-the-fire-of-a-thousand-suns-by-maria-bustillos">they still need the help of Jake</a> to decide on allowing their women to have any say in marital arrangements. And, given that Neytiri is precise in addressing the final step of a warrior is to choose “his woman,” it becomes abundantly clear the film is likewise heterosexist. Cameron bragging about slapping <a href="http://blogs.howstuffworks.com/2009/12/17/is-james-camerons-avatar-sexist/">prosthetic breasts on non-mammal females doesn’t help</a>, either.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To be clear, I&#8217;m not trying to pretend I didn&#8217;t enjoy the movie. I liked watching it a lot, and would recommend it to anyone looking for an escapist fantasy. (And seeing it in 3D, for which we had to wait another hour past the non-3D showtime we intended to see, was worth it. This is a <em>very </em>pretty movie.) But I do think it&#8217;s unfortunate that a movie with such revolutionary <em>technological </em>storytelling power was a rehash of the same white-man-saves-noble-savage trope.</p>
<p>Finally, for some delightful <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FridgeLogic">fridge logic</a>, isn&#8217;t the &#8216;victory&#8217; at the end of the movie incredibly hollow? Sure, they kick the humans &#8211; &#8220;except for a special few&#8221; off-planet. But there <em>must </em>be another mining ship on its way, and sooner or later (within about 10 years, if the ~5 year transit time indicated in the movie is accurate) the humans will be back with <em>much </em>heavier firepower.</p>
<p>What, you didn&#8217;t think conquering the colonialists actually <em>works, </em>did you?</p>
<p>(Bonus links: <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Film/Avatar">Avatar at TVTropes</a> and Cameron saying (paraphrased) <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/08/james-cameron-the-new-trek-rocks-but-transformers-is-gimcrackery.html">&#8220;Yeah, it&#8217;s Dances with Wolves in space.&#8221;</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fridaythang.com/blog/2009/12/28/dances-with-avatars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-sex relationships, straight people, and Facebook</title>
		<link>http://fridaythang.com/blog/2009/09/18/same-sex-relationships-straight-people-and-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://fridaythang.com/blog/2009/09/18/same-sex-relationships-straight-people-and-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterosexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fridaythang.com/blog/?p=1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Daisy posted about straight people &#8211; usually women &#8211; &#8220;in a relationship&#8221; with people of the same gender. From the comments: I’m quite sure that these women aren’t trying to trivialize lesbian relationships — I just think that’s the result. In order to have people I don’t know well take seriously my listing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, Daisy posted about straight people &#8211; usually women &#8211; &#8220;in a relationship&#8221; <a href="http://deardiaspora.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/and-another-thing-that-bothers-me/">with people of the same gender</a>. From the comments:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’m quite sure that these women aren’t <em>trying</em> to trivialize lesbian relationships — I just think that’s the result. In order to have people I don’t know well take seriously my listing on FB as “in a relationship” with my girlfriend, I need to also list myself as “interested in women.” I find this annoying, because I’m not interested in anyone but my girlfriend. If the majority of female/female relationship pairings on FB weren’t jokes, no one would assume mine was a joke too.</p></blockquote>
<p>While I hadn&#8217;t really considered the nature of Facebook relationships before, I agree that placing non-romantic same-sex relationships on Facebook on the same footing as romantic relationships has the ultimate effect of diluting those actual romantic relationships.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, I was at a bar with some friends and one of them had to go outside for a few minutes for a phone call. Someone asked who she&#8217;d been talking with and she said, &#8220;Oh, my wife.&#8221; She and I had talked about this a while ago, before Daisy&#8217;s post, because I noticed on Facebook that she and this friend were listed as &#8220;Married.&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;d said that their relationship was really that close, that they were much more intimate than mere friends, and that &#8211; no &#8211; the weren&#8217;t actually romantically involved; they both identify as &#8216;straight.&#8217;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really give it much thought at the time but, because of Daisy&#8217;s post, I&#8217;ve reconsidered. This friend and I are actually on pretty close footing in terms of how we view feminism and sexism in American culture, and have had good discussions about how to deal with sexist jokes made by friends (or friends of friends). I&#8217;d kind of like to bring this discussion up, and maybe I will when I see her this weekend, but I&#8217;m not sure how, or what specifically I&#8217;d hope to accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fridaythang.com/blog/2009/09/18/same-sex-relationships-straight-people-and-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

