Category: mundane

Train thoughts

By , March 12, 2011 3:13 pm

Typed Saturday morning, on the train, and the last bit in the hotel
Sleeping on a train is harder than I thought it would be. Rather, sleeping on a train’s coach seating is harder than I thought it would be. I enjoyed the clickity-clack (very soothing) but had the hardest time finding a comfortable position. I’d think I had something, try for five or ten minutes to fall asleep, and then toss and turn in frustration. I went through permutations sitting upright, on my side, with my legs up on the tray table, everything. (I wish I’d had the guts to try my feet up on the chair in front of me, something I saw folks doing this morning and which looked somewhat comfy.)  I finally managed to fall asleep, around midnight or 1AM, by sprawling across my and my neighbor’s seat, as Keith was off somewhere. I was much embarrassed this morning to find out he came back about 2AM to find me taking up both of our seats, but rather than wake me decided to sleep in the lounge car. That said, the couches in the lounge car do look pretty comfortable – I may try sleeping on one on the way back.

Breakfast was yummy, and not horribly expensive. Omelet, potatoes, and a croissant, along with communal seating. I ended up siting with Keith and two strangers, one from Spokane traveling to Georgia (a long trip!) and one from Minneapolis travelling to DC. Once again, the topic of why we were on the train came up, and I gave my cop-out answer of gay rights. Keith, of course, reiterated that he was supportive, as was Spokane. Minneapolis stayed quiet, though, while the three of us had a conversation about equality. I was too chicken to ask Minneapolis about her views and, to be honest, wasn’t sure I wanted to hear them over breakfast. Once Minneapolis left, Spokane, Keith and I continued chatting about politics, immigration, the state of the nation, and the same things any good liberals discuss when they run into each other in potentially hostile territory.

I’m on the lounge car right now, facing a river (stream? creek?) that the train has been traveling along since I woke up around 6AM. It’s very pretty, and hopefully some of the pictures I’ve been taking will turn out well. I’m not 100% sold on train travel yet – I think my ability to sleep on the way back will help determine my final verdict – but it’s hard to argue with the view and the sense of actually traveling. Not just stepping onto a magic metal tube and appearing somewhere else hours later. Likewise, as Spokane said at breakfast, strangers you might never speak to on an airplane become potential companions and conversation partners on a train. (Something I took advantage of last night to get some filming done, and something I hope to take advantage of again this morning.)

There’s a sense this morning of leaving my gender behind, as I’m thinking about No Gender Left Behind. As much as Keith’s views on women (see the previous post) were grating, I’m honest enough to admit I enjoyed his claims of how pretty I was. (And since he talked at length about his girlfriend, wasn’t too worried about his ‘gentlemanly’ flirting becoming anything more.) And there’s been something surreal of my lack of trans-ness on this train. It hasn’t been something I’ve had to reveal, and so (even if I don’t like the politics of keeping silent) I haven’t revealed it. I’ve just been another woman on the train. A lesbian, perhaps, once I start talking about traveling to DC for gay rights. But much less of an ‘other’ than I sometimes think – rightly or wrongly – that I’m viewed at.

At the same time, my gender – my trans gender – has been left behind, way back in Chicago and the Land of Lincoln, because that same sense of freedom is a sense of isolation: there is no one else like me. I’m hoping the networking and policy events for the lobbying prep will help with that. I’m really looking forward to the opportunity to chat with other trans folks, and our allies. But for right now, I watch the changing-yet-the-same landscape out the window, count the windmills (20 from this view – go alternative energy!), and try to take photos without picking up the reflections in the glass.

Written in the hotel

After getting off the train, there was an amazing feeling of the calm of train travel: this is a civilized way to travel. No obnoxious security checks, no ridiculous lines, and you’re deposited in the heart of the city rather than the outskirts. I’m hoping my sleep on the way back will be better, because I WANT to be convinced that train is superior to plane; I’ve enjoyed every single thing – the food, the space, the sense of travel, the atmosphere – except sleeping. So we’ll see how the trip back goes.

Checking in was fine. A little trouble with payment from using United rewards miles, but everything is figured out and I’m about to hop in the shower. More updates later!

Please excuse the interuption

By , March 2, 2011 9:15 pm

Been knocked on my ass by a major cold (thanks, high school students…) so am pretty out of commission this week. Hopefully I’ll return to health (and regular postings) soon!

Disingenuous Arguments about the Constitution

By , February 16, 2011 12:23 pm

The Constitution says this. No, it says that. No, this other thing. Being born in the US obviously means you’re a citizen. Um, no, it doesn’t. The Second Amendment is an individual right. Well, maybe it’s a collective right. Abortion is a fundamental right under the Constitution. Think again! Obama’s healthcare law is constitutional. Or is itAnd what the hell is up with privacy? Is it in or not?

At the heart of all of these arguments is an attempt to interpret what the Founding Fathers meant. What the Constitution “really” means today. Except that discussion – while academically interesting - is side-stepping the actual issue which should be under discussion: What do we want the Constitution to mean?

Don’t take that question to mean I’m in favor of so-called judicial activism. Rather, I think if certain things are so clearly ambiguous in the Constitution, we should change the friggin’ document!

Continue reading 'Disingenuous Arguments about the Constitution'»

Chicago = snow

By , February 2, 2011 7:15 pm

Pictures I took today:

I want this job!

By , January 20, 2011 5:44 pm

I’ve been very bad at posting this week, for which I apologize. Been getting grant stuff together for a few grant applications, as well as teaching and working on a few other projects.

I also found a job I really want.

Really really want.

Continue reading 'I want this job!'»

Anyone have a good ‘temp’ pun?

By , January 4, 2011 2:04 pm

This morning, I went to interview with a temping agency in Chicago, to get my resume and info on file for possible temp jobs in the future. This wasn’t something I was excited about doing, but I’m trying to leave myself open to all possibilities for earning money without returning to a fulltime job. I really love the flexibility and creative time I have (for example, I’m currently writing this in a Starbucks, having just come from a yoga class at my gym) but want to be back on slightly firmer financial footing.

The interview process was a new experience for me, coming as I have from primarily non-profit and arts organizations. I was warned beforehand by friends about the ‘proficiency tests’ but they’re really more ridiculous than I expected. MS Word, Excel, and Powerpoint mockups, with different tasks like “Open file X” or “Set the template for this document to Y.” Unfortunately, you only had two tries for each instruction, meaning some things I’m sure I could have figured out I still ‘failed’ because I didn’t get them right immediately. Even so, I got 86% right on Powerpoint, 96% right on Word, and 97% right on Excel. That last one, according to the woman who interviewed me, “never happens,” so that felt nice! I also got “really high” typing scores of just around 100 WPM for straight typing, and “very good” and “excellent” typing scores for alphanumeric data entry and pure numerical data entry, respectively.

That said, because I’m teaching Tuesday and Thursday afternoons, the temp agency said I might have trouble getting assignments, as there aren’t a ton of one-day assignments these days. But we’ll see!

Continue reading 'Anyone have a good ‘temp’ pun?'»

A girly sadness

By , December 29, 2010 3:47 pm

I feel kind of silly – well, kind of girly – to be bummed about this, but I just learned my hair stylist moved to Baltimore last month. She didn’t exactly do anything amazing with my hair, but I liked her a lot and had seen her for maybe 10 years. She was one of the first people I came out to (in college) who was neither a friend, family member, or doctor, and going to the salon where she worked of the first publicly ‘girly’ things I allowed myself to do.

In a small way, this makes my life easier, since I had to come up to Evanston instead of going to one of the many salons down the street from me in Chicago. At the same time, I’m going to miss having someone I know so well – and who knows me – and have to search out someone new.

Stay tuned, though! Hopefully I’ll come back with photos of an amazing new haircut…

Pinning down “rape” in the media

By , December 23, 2010 4:39 pm

The rape accusations leveled against Julian Assange have  meant the media has lately been discussing what it means to be raped, and – more broadly- how is rape defined? I must admit, I’m having difficulty finding exact information on what Assange has been accused of. I know two women allege he committed some sexual misconduct, but some places I’ve read it wasn’t (legally) rape, while most news sources are nevertheless calling it such. (If anyone has links to better information, I’d appreciate ‘em. Thanks!) Regardless of Assange’s guilt or innocence, though, the news coverage sparked an interesting conversation between a friend and I, about the difficulties of presenting objective coverage around rape accusations.

Specifically, it made me think about the differences between discussing a crime left theft – or even murder – in comparison to discussing rape.

Because when you’re talking about those crimes, there’s (usually) no debate about whether or not a crime occurred, it’s just an issue of who did it. Most news coverage you hear around non-sexual crimes don’t debate that, say, Alice was robbed or Bob was murdered. Every so often there will be a story of arson for insurance money, sure, but those are the exception, not the rule.

Not so with rape.

Continue reading 'Pinning down “rape” in the media'»

DADT on its way to being DEAD

By , December 18, 2010 4:23 pm

The Washington Post has responses from Obama and others about the vote, but the long and short of it is that the Senate passed a DADT repeal, 63 to 33. I’m very pleased to say both Senators from Illinois – Dick Durbin (who I like a lot) and Mark Kirk (who I don’t particularly like) voted in favor of the repeal. I just called both of ‘em to leave them “Thank you!” messages, and hope you’ll all do the same – call your Senators, whether or not you agreed with their vote, especially if you disagreed – and tell them so!

Joined the gym!

By , October 5, 2010 7:11 pm

After a lot of waffling, I asked my dad to get me a membership to the gym down the street. I’m excited because a few of my friends in the neighborhood are members, and one of my roommates just re-joined. I’m hoping to work specifically on my endurance and flexibility, since I think my strength is just fine. To be totally honest, I think my years ‘on’ testosterone (read: hormonally male) left me with pretty ripped muscles for a girl my age, but what I consider sub-par flexibility. Although I may be unfairly be judging myself against all the other women in circus classes. Damn them and their bendiness. As for my endurance, I just don’t bike or exercise as much as I used to, and I’d like to keep my breath longer.

We’ll see how it goes!

Panorama Theme by Themocracy